The Court of Arbitration for Sport convenes Thursday in Lausanne to hear Senegal's appeal against the Confederation of African Football's decision to strip the team of the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations title. The stakes extend well beyond a trophy: this is a jurisdictional fight over who gets to define the outcome of a football match — the referee on the pitch or administrators in an office weeks later. The facts are not in dispute. Senegal beat Morocco 1-0 after extra time in the January final in Rabat. Before that, Senegal walked off the pitch for 14 minutes to protest a late penalty decision, with several players returning to the dressing room. They came back. Morocco missed the penalty. Play continued through extra time, Senegal scored the winner, and the match ended in regulation fashion. Two months later, CAF's Appeal Board invoked tournament regulations stating that a team which "leaves the ground before the regular end of the match without the authorisation of the referee" shall be "considered the loser and shall be eliminated for good." They awarded Morocco a 3-0 victory, retroactively erasing a completed match. The title changed hands without a ball being kicked. The legal fight turns on a single interpretive question: does a temporary departure equal abandonment? Senegal's lawyers will argue the regulation requires permanent departure and that the Laws of the Game make the referee's in-match decisions final. Morocco will argue that any unauthorized departure triggers the forfeiture clause, regardless of whether the team returned. The three-person CAS panel — chaired by French civil rights expert Gerald Simon, joined by Italian international law professor Luigi Fumagalli and Hamburg-based law professor Ulrich Haas — will weigh these competing readings. The broader governance question is whether CAF's post-hoc intervention represents legitimate regulatory enforcement or institutional overreach. The referee allowed play to resume. The match was completed. The penalty was missed. Extra time was played. A goal was scored. CAF's Appeals Board effectively ruled that none of this mattered — that administrative regulation supersedes the sporting outcome. If CAS upholds this logic, any temporary protest action by any team in any CAF competition could retroactively void a completed result. Meanwhile, both teams have moved on operationally. AFCON 2027 qualifying is underway: Senegal drew with Mozambique and beat Ethiopia under new coach Patrick Vieira; Morocco won both openers against Gabon and Lesotho. The title dispute now runs parallel to active competition, creating a liminal period where the 2025 champion remains formally contested. CAS confirmed the decision will not come on the day of the hearing. The panel will deliberate without a public timeline, leaving African football's most consequential governance dispute in suspension.