Imagine you're adding hot water to a pot of frozen spaghetti that's stuck together in clumps. At some temperature, every strand separates and floats freely — and you want to know the exact degree where that happens. Not approximately. Not "somewhere around boiling." The precise number, for every possible shape of pasta. That's what this paper does for quantum entanglement in a broad class of many-body systems. The committed claim: for Pauli Hamiltonians of bounded overlap degree Δ ≥ 2 with unit-bounded coefficients, the author determines the exact inverse-temperature threshold zΔ = arctanh[max{0≤x≤1} x((1−x)/(1+x))^{Δ−1}] below which the Gibbs state is a mixture of product Pauli eigenstates — meaning fully separable, zero entanglement. Above zΔ, there exist finite commuting Hamiltonians whose Gibbs states are provably entangled. This is not an upper bound or a lower bound. It is the sharp threshold, and it is universal across the entire class. Where does this sit on the ladder? The high-temperature separability question has been studied through several prior frameworks — Brandão and Kastoryano's 2019 results on rapid mixing, Bakshi-Liu-Moitra-Tang's recent polynomial-time Gibbs samplers, and various bounds derived from cluster expansion or belief propagation techniques. Those approaches give sufficient conditions for separability but not tight ones. Kiani's result is a strict improvement: the threshold is exact and matches a constructive entangled counterexample on the other side. The closest prior art would be the belief-propagation-style thresholds from classical spin systems (the independent-set polynomial / Lovász local lemma family), and this paper directly adapts that machinery to the quantum setting. The architecture is combinatorial-analytic, not computational. The proof leans on the structure of Pauli commutation graphs and a self-consistent fixed-point equation reminiscent of tree recursions in statistical physics. The key move is showing that the Gibbs state decomposes as a mixture over product Pauli eigenstates when the inverse temperature is low enough, and that this decomposition fails at exactly the computed threshold via an explicit commuting-Hamiltonian counterexample. The classical sampling algorithm at β < zΔ runs in polynomial time and approximates the Gibbs state in trace distance — meaning you don't just know the state is separable, you can efficiently produce classical samples from it. Integrity here is mathematical proof, not simulation — the strongest possible validation regime for a theoretical result. The threshold is proved sharp by a matching lower-bound construction: for every β > zΔ, a commuting Hamiltonian with the right degree constraint has an entangled Gibbs state. There is no benchmark-selection concern because the result is universal over the stated class. The only scope limitation is the restriction to Pauli Hamiltonians with bounded overlap degree and unit-bounded coefficients — a natural but not all-encompassing class. The milestone to watch is extension beyond commuting counterexamples. The separability threshold is proved for all Pauli Hamiltonians of bounded degree, but the matching entanglement construction uses commuting Hamiltonians specifically. The open question — does the same threshold apply as the entanglement boundary for non-commuting Hamiltonians? — is the obvious next target. If yes, this threshold becomes the universal phase boundary for the entire class; if no, there's a gap between commuting and non-commuting worlds that would itself be interesting. The successor experiment not run: extending the entanglement counterexample to non-commuting Hamiltonians, or proving a separation between commuting and non-commuting entanglement thresholds. The honest read is (c) — this is the natural content of the next paper. The current result already settles the commuting case and proves separability universally; the non-commuting entanglement direction likely requires substantially different techniques.
