Imagine you're a locksmith, but instead of picking one lock at a time, you have a master skeleton key that works on every lock in a building — as long as all those locks share a hidden structural pattern. Shor's algorithm is essentially that skeleton key for a specific family of patterns (periodic functions hiding in abelian groups). This paper asks: what if the locks themselves are quantum? What if the hidden pattern isn't in a classical function but in a quantum state, a unitary gate, or a Hamiltonian? Can you still efficiently find the skeleton key? The committed claim: efficient quantum algorithms exist for learning symmetries of quantum objects — states, unitaries, Hamiltonians, and finite collections of states — extending the Hidden Subgroup Problem (HSP) framework into genuinely quantum territory, including non-abelian groups with normal hidden subgroups and a broad class of ambient groups. This is not the first paper on StateHSP (that was introduced recently), but it is the first to crack the non-abelian case in meaningful generality and to introduce the physically motivated 'Anyonic' symmetry learning variant. The architecture is pure quantum information theory: representation-theoretic reductions, no variational circuits, no optimization loops, no heuristics. The core technical move is a reduction from the new Anyonic symmetry problem to the existing StateHSP framework, and the bridge between them is a novel connection between linearisations of projective representations and linear error-correcting codes. This is algebraic machinery, not numerical machinery. The paper belongs to the structural-algorithmic family of quantum computing — closer to Shor than to VQE. On the ladder: the prior art is the original StateHSP paper, which handled only abelian groups. This paper extends to non-abelian groups (normal subgroups within a broad class), introduces the Anyonic variant that better captures physical equivalence of quantum states (up to global phase), and as a concrete application delivers an improved algorithm for learning stabiliser groups of mixed qudit states of arbitrary local dimension. The stabiliser-group result is the most immediately benchmarkable output — it improves on prior algorithms that were restricted to pure states or specific dimensions. Integrity is strong for a theory paper. The results are mathematical: the algorithms are proven efficient (polynomial time) via reduction chains, not demonstrated empirically. There is no simulation, no benchmark suite, no experimental validation — and none is claimed. The validation is proof-based, which is the appropriate standard for this kind of work. The question is whether the reductions are tight and the complexity bounds are honest, which is auditable from the 50-page manuscript. No code is released, but for a pure-theory contribution this is standard. The milestone question is nuanced. This is foundational theory, not an engineering result. The immediate unlock is conceptual: the community now has a general framework for learning quantum symmetries across multiple object types, not just classical ones. The practical milestone is whether these algorithms can be instantiated on near-term quantum hardware for stabiliser-group learning or quantum error correction tasks. The gap is hardware-dependent — the algorithms are efficient in gate complexity, but actual implementation awaits fault-tolerant quantum computers with sufficient qubit counts and gate fidelities. The obvious next experiment not run: an actual implementation, even on a simulator, of the stabiliser-group learning algorithm on a nontrivial mixed qudit state. The honest read is (a) — this is a theory group, the paper is 50 pages of algebra, and implementation is a different skill set and compute environment. A secondary gap: the non-abelian results require normal hidden subgroups. The non-normal case remains open, and the authors likely know this is hard — it mirrors the classical non-abelian HSP barrier (graph isomorphism territory). They're probably not saving it; it's genuinely unsolved.
