Imagine you're solving a jigsaw puzzle, but instead of keeping each piece's edge pattern, you round every edge to "bumpy" or "flat" — two categories instead of hundreds. You've just destroyed the information you need to match pieces. This paper proves that for a specific quantum puzzle called the Dihedral Coset Problem, discarding even a modest fraction of the "edge detail" — the Fourier labels — makes the puzzle provably unsolvable. The committed claim: any quantum algorithm following the Regev (2004) Fourier-sampling and subset-sum-measurement template that drops more than ω(log n) bits from each Fourier label after measuring the lower n−1 bits of the subset sum cannot solve the Dihedral Coset Problem. Period. This is not a heuristic argument or a complexity-theoretic barrier conditional on some conjecture — it's a proved information-loss bound. Why does this matter outside pure math? The Dihedral Coset Problem is the bottleneck for quantum attacks on lattice-based cryptography, which is the leading post-quantum crypto standard (NIST selected CRYSTALS-Kyber/Dilithium). Regev's 2004 template is the dominant approach to DCP, and any algorithm that cracks it efficiently would threaten the entire post-quantum infrastructure buildout. This paper draws a hard boundary on what that template can afford to throw away. The immediate application is surgical: Simon's August 2026 algorithm (IACR ePrint:2026/1591), which claimed progress on DCP, is shown to be implementable using only the top third of Fourier label bits after the subset-sum measurement. Since the paper's no-go theorem requires retention of all but ω(log n) bits, and one-third is vastly less than that, Simon's algorithm falls squarely within the forbidden regime. It provably cannot solve DCP. The integrity here is unusually strong for a theory paper. The core results are mathematical proofs, not simulations or benchmarks — the validation regime is deductive, not empirical. And critically, the authors release Lean 4 formalized proofs, which means the argument has been machine-checked. This is the gold standard: you don't have to trust the authors' reasoning or the referees' attention spans; you can trust the proof assistant. Architecturally, this lives in the quantum query/information-theoretic complexity family — it's a structural impossibility result, not an algorithm. The technique examines mutual information between Fourier labels and the hidden shift after coarse-graining, proving the information loss is irrecoverable. Think of it as a channel capacity argument applied to the specific structure of dihedral group representations. The milestone question is where to watch. This paper does NOT solve DCP or advance toward solving it — it closes off a path. The open question remains: is there a template outside Regev's framework that can solve DCP efficiently? Or a way to retain all Fourier-label bits while keeping the algorithm tractable? The field is still stuck at subexponential (2^√n) quantum query complexity for DCP, and any polynomial-time solution would reshape post-quantum cryptography overnight.
