Imagine you're a building inspector with two tape measures. One always reports the smallest plausible distance between two walls — generous, forgiving. The other always reports the largest plausible distance — strict, worst-case. For years, quantum information theory has been doing all its bookkeeping with the generous tape measure: trace distance, purified distance, and their relatives are all minimal extensions of classical distance measures to the quantum setting. This paper asks: what happens when you switch to the strict tape measure? The committed claim is this: when you replace the standard (minimal) quantum distance measures with their maximal classical extensions, some quantum information processing tasks are completely unaffected, while others see their fundamental performance rates change from expressions involving the Umegaki relative entropy to ones involving the Belavkin-Staszewski (BS) relative entropy. This is the first systematic operational connection between BS relative entropy and concrete information-processing tasks. The results split cleanly. Channel coding and quantum resource distillation — tasks where you're concentrating value from noisy inputs — turn out to be immune to the change of metric. The rates stay the same. But channel simulation and resource dilution — tasks where you're spreading a resource into noisy copies — get strictly harder under maximal distances. Their rates are now governed by the BS relative entropy, which is always at least as large as the Umegaki version and can be strictly larger. This asymmetry is the paper's sharpest finding. The architectural backbone is one-shot information theory with smoothing. The authors work within the framework of generalized quantum divergences (specifically the family of z-Rényi divergences for z ∈ [-∞, 0) ∪ (0, 1]), characterize their smoothed versions under maximal distance metrics, and then take asymptotic limits. The key structural move is showing that the maximal f-divergences — a whole family parameterized by operator convex functions — collapse to the BS relative entropy in the asymptotic limit, just as minimal f-divergences collapse to Umegaki. The casualty is reversibility. The reverse Shannon theorem — one of quantum information theory's most elegant results — says that the cost of simulating a channel asymptotically equals the rate at which you can code over it, making the theory thermodynamically 'reversible.' Under maximal distances, that equality breaks. Simulation costs more than coding gains. Similarly, quantum resource theories lose their known asymptotic reversibility: distillation and dilution rates diverge. The authors show this concretely for quantum states and channels in general resource-theoretic settings. Integrity here is mathematical proof, not simulation or experiment. The results are theorems with full proofs across 28 pages plus appendices. The baselines are not stale — the authors compare directly against the established results of Tomamichel-Hayashi, Datta, Berta-Christandl-Renner, and the resource-theoretic reversibility results of Brandão-Plenio and others. The validation is as non-circular as mathematical quantum information gets: you either prove the theorem or you don't. The practical upshot for anyone building quantum protocols: if your error metric is worst-case over all classical projections rather than best-case, your simulation and dilution costs go up — potentially unboundedly for certain states. This is not an exotic edge case; maximal distances arise naturally when you want guarantees that hold under every possible measurement, not just the most favorable one. The gap between the two regimes is quantified by the gap between Umegaki and BS relative entropies, which the authors show can be arbitrarily large. What the authors did not do — and the obvious next step — is compute explicit rates for specific physically motivated channels or resource theories under maximal distances. The paper establishes the general framework and proves the key asymptotic formulas, but concrete worked examples showing how much worse things get for, say, entanglement dilution of Werner states are left open. The honest read: this is a foundations paper, and the examples are being saved for follow-up work or collaborators with specific physical systems in mind.
