Imagine you're a conductor leading two jazz pianists who've never met. Each pianist reads their own sheet music, but the piece only works if their rhythms interlock — when the left hand lifts a jar, the right hand must already be turning the lid. You can't just train each pianist separately and hope for coherence; you need a shared conductor who hears the whole piece and nudges both players toward coordination. That's exactly what DONIC does for robot hands: one unified policy watches both hands and the object between them, learning when to lead, when to follow, and when to grip harder. The committed claim: DONIC is the first single-checkpoint bimanual dexterous tracker trained jointly across heterogeneous operation categories and human-motion sources, achieving 86.79% success on unseen trajectories of training objects and 57.32% on entirely held-out objects. The margins are not incremental — they surpass the best existing bimanual tracking baselines by 77.36 and 45.73 percentage points respectively. The architectural backbone is PPO (proximal policy optimization) augmented with behavioral cloning in a self-improving feedback loop. Successful rollouts get recycled back into the demonstration buffer, so the policy progressively learns from its own verified successes rather than only from imperfect retargeted human references. Two key design choices distinguish the approach: an object-centered per-hand reward that maintains object-motion feedback while supervising each hand according to its contact role, and Clip-Centered Advantages that remove reference-dependent advantage offsets while preserving within-trajectory signal. These aren't cosmetic additions — without them, a single policy trained on heterogeneous bimanual references collapses into mediocre compromise behavior. The data pipeline matters as much as the algorithm. BiHOI is a new multi-view dataset of 1,575 sequences spanning 229 objects with sustained bimanual interaction — not just grasps, but the sustained two-handed coordination that existing datasets largely ignore. Human hand-object interactions are reconstructed from multi-view video and retargeted to robot morphology, bridging the gap between human demonstrations and simulatable robot references. This is where the generalist ambition becomes concrete: the policy sees pouring, twisting, assembling, and holding across a wide object distribution. On the ladder, the comparison is stark. The strongest prior bimanual tracking baseline achieves roughly 9.4% success on unseen trajectories of training objects and 11.6% on held-out objects. DONIC's 86.79% and 57.32% aren't marginal improvements — they represent a qualitative regime change from "barely works" to "mostly works." The 57.32% on truly novel objects is the more meaningful number: it measures genuine generalization rather than memorization of training object geometries. Integrity has both strengths and gaps. The evaluation is in simulation (IsaacGym), which is standard for this stage of dexterous manipulation research but means we're one transfer gap away from real hardware. The authors use held-out objects and unseen trajectories, which is stronger than same-object evaluation, but there's no independent replication and no pre-registration. The 77-point margin over baselines is large enough that cherry-picking alone can't explain it, but the specific baselines compared should be scrutinized — the field is moving fast and "SOTA" depends on which month you check. The successor experiment everyone is waiting for is sim-to-real transfer. The paper stays entirely in simulation. The honest read: this is almost certainly (a) running out of hardware budget and (b) being saved for the next paper. Sim-to-real for bimanual dexterity with contact-rich manipulation is genuinely hard — tactile sensing, compliant control, and domain randomization all become load-bearing. If DONIC's policy transfers even partially to real Shadow Hands or Allegro Hands, that's a separate landmark result. If it doesn't, the 86.79% number is a simulation artifact, not a capability claim.
