Imagine you and a friend are each assigned to paint a massive map — countries, borders, the whole thing — using as few crayon colors as possible, but you're in separate rooms and can't talk. Classically, you'd need a huge box of crayons to guarantee you never clash on a shared border. But if you share a pair of magic dice (entangled qubits), you can somehow coordinate on just three colors, no matter how enormous and tangled the map gets. That's the core result here: the quantum advantage for graph coloring isn't just a little better — it's unboundedly better. The committed claim: for every d ≥ 4, there exist d-to-1 label-cover games with arbitrarily small classical value that nonetheless admit perfect quantum strategies using finite-dimensional entanglement. The direct consequence is graphs with quantum chromatic number χq = 3 whose classical chromatic number χ can be made arbitrarily large. This is the first improvement on the quantum chromatic gap since Brassard, Cleve, and Tapp's 1999 result, which showed χ growing exponentially in χq but never pinned χq to a constant. The architecture is purely mathematical — no hardware, no simulation, no experiment. The proof pipeline is a four-stage construction: (1) start with the Mermin–Peres magic square, a canonical pseudo-telepathy game, and 'stretch' it by inserting long equation wires between its constraints, which increases the radius of quantum measurement contexts while preserving classical unsatisfiability; (2) apply parallel repetition to drive classical value below any ε; (3) convert the resulting system into a multi-layered Kneser hypergraph via a PCP construction due to Dinur, Guruswami, Khot, and Regev (STOC'03); (4) feed this into the Fei–Minzer–Wang reduction from hypergraph coloring to 4-to-1 games, proving that the reduction preserves both quantum completeness and context radius. Each stage is load-bearing — skip one and the chain breaks. On the ladder: the prior art is narrow but precisely defined. Brassard–Cleve–Tapp (1999) established that a quantum chromatic gap exists and grows exponentially, but the quantum side scaled with the problem. Ciardo conjectured at SODA'25 that χq could be pinned to 3 while χ diverges. This paper proves that conjecture for d ≥ 4. There is no competing approach that achieves constant χq with unbounded χ — this is the first. The result also confirms a strong form of pseudo-telepathy for Khot's d-to-1 games, a structural prediction in the complexity-theoretic study of nonlocal games. Integrity here is mathematical proof, the gold standard for this kind of result. There is no simulation to cherry-pick, no benchmark to game. The validation is deductive: either the proof is correct or it isn't. The risk is a subtle error in one of the four pipeline stages — particularly in establishing that the Fei–Minzer–Wang reduction preserves context radius, which is the novel verification work. Peer review will focus there. The paper builds on named, published prior constructions (Mermin–Peres, DGKR, Fei–Minzer–Wang), so the proof is modular and auditable. The milestone question for this subfield isn't hardware — it's structural. The next number to watch is d = 2 or d = 3: can the result be pushed below d ≥ 4? Khot's Unique Games Conjecture corresponds to d = 1, which is a far harder target. The d = 2 and d = 3 cases would significantly tighten the landscape of quantum advantage in constraint satisfaction. The authors leave this explicitly open. The obvious successor experiment is the d = 2 or d = 3 case, and the honest read is (c) — the current pipeline breaks for small d because the Fei–Minzer–Wang reduction specifically requires d ≥ 4. A new reduction or an entirely different approach would be needed. The authors almost certainly know this and are either working on it or believe it requires fundamentally new ideas. A secondary open question is whether the finite-dimensional entanglement requirement can be tightened — what is the minimal entanglement dimension as a function of χ?
