Imagine you're carrying a tray of drinks through a crowd. You can balance the tray with your arms in many positions, but some of those positions leave you unable to react if someone bumps you — your elbows are locked, your wrists are maxed out. The smart move is to keep your arms in a position that's not just balanced, but ready to adjust. That's exactly the problem this paper solves for hexarotors and octorotors: among the infinite rotor-speed combos that produce the same thrust and torque, pick the ones that preserve the vehicle's ability to change course fast. The core claim: you can certify that a drone's rotor allocation preserves a minimum "readiness" — the ability to rapidly change its wrench — across an entire sample interval, even with uncertain actuator delays, without ever computing a Lipschitz constant. Prior readiness barriers worked only in continuous time. The moment you introduce real-world sampling (commands arriving every few milliseconds) and actuator delay uncertainty (±2 ms jitter), those continuous guarantees evaporate to sub-millisecond coverage. This paper closes the gap. The mechanism exploits a structural gift: each rotor's speed responds monotonically and in closed form to its own torque command. This means the set of reachable rotor speeds under uncertain switching times forms a box — a hyperrectangle — and the worst-case readiness over that box always sits at one of its corners. You don't need to search a continuum; you check a finite set of vertices. That's computationally cheap and yields an exact, Lipschitz-free guarantee that readiness stays above its floor from one sample instant to the next. The architecture is a constrained allocation filter layered on top of an existing flight controller. It solves a convex program at each sample: minimize tracking error subject to the constraint that readiness remains above a floor across the entire inter-sample interval and under all delay realizations within the known jitter band. When no feasible allocation exists, a fallback torque keeps the vehicle on a pre-certified trajectory. This is a safety-filter / control-barrier-function approach, firmly in the family of optimization-based allocation with set-invariance guarantees. Validation is simulation-only but thorough within that scope. Hexarotor tests span delays from 2 to 40 ms with ±2 ms jitter — a realistic range for hobby-grade ESCs. The readiness floor was never violated across any tested condition. At 10±2 ms delay, the filter matched a delay-compensating predictor baseline within the design envelope. Beyond the envelope, the filter cost 2–30% more tracking error but maintained its safety guarantee, while the predictor violated the readiness floor in 2 to 16 out of 16 missions. That's a clean tradeoff: you pay a bit in tracking for a hard safety certificate. The missing experiment is hardware. This is a simulation paper, submitted to IEEE, with no flight-test data. The monotonicity assumption on ESC response and the box-overapproximation of reachable speeds are clean in simulation but will face unmodeled dynamics on real hardware — thermal effects, ESC nonlinearities, aerodynamic coupling. The honest read is that the author is likely building toward flight tests for the journal version or a follow-up, and the simulation campaign is the prerequisite. The practical milestone is straightforward: fly this filter on a real hexarotor with measured ESC delays and jitter, and show the readiness floor holds. If it does, you have a certifiable allocation layer that could slot into any overactuated platform — inspection drones, delivery vehicles, urban air mobility — where proving robustness to actuator degradation is a regulatory requirement.
