RedirectMimic Teaches Humanoid Robots to Ignore Specific Motions While Following Everything Else

A training-time trick splits what a humanoid robot sees from what it's rewarded for, letting it selectively suppress forbidden movements without retraining from scratch.

Imagine you're a pianist sight-reading a score, but your teacher has secretly taped over certain measures with replacement passages. You still see the original sheet music on the stand, but during practice, your teacher only rewards you when you play the replacement bars in those spots — and the original notes everywhere else. After enough rehearsals, you learn to automatically substitute the corrected passages even though you're still reading the original score. That's RedirectMimic in a nutshell: a training regime that decouples what the robot observes from what it's rewarded for executing, so it learns to suppress specific motions while faithfully tracking everything else. The committed claim: RedirectMimic is the first method to achieve reliable local motion content redaction in whole-body humanoid control — selectively removing specific movement patterns from a reference motion library without degrading tracking accuracy on non-redacted motions and without modifying the deployed policy's observation or action interfaces. The paper frames this as a new problem category: you want a humanoid executing diverse whole-body behaviors from a large motion library, but certain movements (say, arms raised overhead, or fast outward arm swings) are off-limits for your application. Prior approaches — zeroing out the tracking reward for those joints, or adding an anti-tracking penalty — leave the replacement motion unspecified and produce degraded or unstable results. The method sits in the PPO-based motion-tracking family that dominates sim-to-real humanoid control. The pretrained tracker follows 7,509 motion clips on a Unitree G1 in IsaacGym simulation. RedirectMimic introduces an "edited reference" — a rule-generated version of each motion where forbidden content is replaced with a specified safe pose. Crucially, the actor policy still receives the original, unedited reference as its observation. Only the reward function sees the edited version. This asymmetry is the core trick: the actor learns to override specific content without any change to its deployed interface. It's a curriculum trick at training time, not an architectural change. The ladder here is internal, not field-wide. The paper compares against two baselines: reward zeroing (simply removing tracking reward for redacted joints) and anti-tracking (penalizing the forbidden content). On the overhead-arm task, RedirectMimic crushes both: 2.7% residual forbidden-content occurrence versus 58.9% for reward zeroing and 32.8% for anti-tracking. Core-window joint success hits 94.2%. On the speed-defined arm task, all three methods suppress fast outward arm movements to similarly low rates, but RedirectMimic achieves the lowest replacement error while tracking unedited motions with accuracy comparable to the pretrained controller. The baselines aren't straw-men — they're reasonable first attempts — but they're all internal comparisons. No external group's method is tested. Integrity is solid for an early-stage sim-only paper but has clear limits. All evaluation is in simulation on one robot morphology (Unitree G1). The 7,509-clip motion library is substantial, but the redaction tasks tested are only two variants (pose-defined and speed-defined arm editing). There's no sim-to-real transfer, no hardware deployment, and no independent replication. The metrics are well-defined — content occurrence rate, joint success, replacement error, fall rate — and the paper reports them transparently, including cases where the advantage is small. But the validation circle is tight: the authors define the problem, the method, the baselines, and the evaluation. The milestone that matters is sim-to-real transfer. The whole point of this line of work is deploying humanoids in safety-constrained environments — warehouses, homes, hospitals — where certain motions are genuinely dangerous. Right now: 94.2% joint success, 2.7% forbidden-content leakage, simulation only. The next concrete target: demonstrating comparable numbers on physical hardware with real sensor noise, contact dynamics, and latency. That's probably 1-2 years away given the current pace of sim-to-real in humanoid locomotion. The obvious experiment not run is physical deployment on the Unitree G1 or any hardware platform. The honest read: this is likely (a) compute/access-constrained — hardware experiments are expensive and slow — combined with (c) saving it for the next paper. The method's design explicitly preserves the deployed observation and action interfaces, which reads as deliberate sim-to-real staging. The other missing experiment is scaling to more diverse redaction types (leg constraints, torso limits, velocity caps across the whole body) and testing robustness when multiple redaction rules interact simultaneously.